Vendor Review

  1. 5 out of 5

    --- dimension: design-quality --- I really like the depth and quality with this template. Well constructed and a very useful source of ideas and best practices. I highly recommend it.

  2. 5 out of 5

    --- dimension: code-quality --- My development team has been very happy with this code and its quality. The features are great. Definitely recommend.

  3. 5 out of 5

    --- dimension: feature-availability --- It comes packed with probably more components and feature samples than you will ever need in a single App. The code is well structured and the documentation covers all essential parts. They are maybe not covering everything if you're new to MUI & React (this is not a beginners practice kit), otherwise, it's really just straightforward. To the previous comments concerning the TypeScript version, it works perfectly if you install everything correctly and don't add verbose ESlint rules! They just cover next/core-web-vitals, if you add extra rules then it's your job to fix them in favor of specific code-style coverage. If you should install the TypeScript version via yarn, I recommend adding a "resolutions" part for "@types/react": "^17.0.45" to your package (or the current version of @types/react in your package) to overcome issues with peer dependencies linking to the v18+ types due to their asterisk version links. This issue has happened a lot lately due to breaking changes in React types and is not specific to this kit. But this should prevent any TS errors related to deps.

  4. 1 out of 5

    --- dimension: bugs --- The TypeScript version has a lot of bugs and can't run a build process sucessfully, it is a dissapointment.

  5. 5 out of 5

    --- dimension: customer-support --- I received a kind, considerate and immediate response, thank you very much!

  6. 4 out of 5

    --- dimension: code-quality --- Amazing template with lots of features. Next build for the TypeScript version has a few errors.

  7. 4 out of 5

    --- dimension: design-quality --- Very nice and easy to use except for the navbar that is lagging and doesn't always render perfectly but that is to be expected with Material UI.

  8. 5 out of 5

    --- dimension: customer-support --- While many templates are next.js, the support is quick and AMAZING and I was able to port this to using react-router v6. Very happy with the quality of everything!!!

  9. 5 out of 5

    --- dimension: code-quality --- Great template and great customer support. Easy to customize, code is easy to read, documentation is good. Very happy!

  10. 3 out of 5

    --- dimension: documentation-quality --- The documentation is pretty rough... When you're able to find what you're looking for, the code is great, the design is great, and everything works. But, you pretty much have to read the code to figure out the full function of the components they have written. It's extremely time consuming and you're sure to be missing out on some of the value you paid for.

  11. 5 out of 5

    --- dimension: code-quality --- Code quality and structure is awsome! Deffinitly learned some things. Also pretty clear and easy to edit.

  12. 5 out of 5

    --- dimension: customer-support --- I had a couple self inflicted issues that were quickly taken care of by the support team. This is a great template. I am loving it.

  13. 5 out of 5

    --- dimension: code-quality --- Good code quality, I learned a lot from this template, high recommended!

  14. 0 out of 5

    The refund policy covers customers when the product doesn't meet their expectations. You can be refunded during the first 48h, as long as you explain how the product failed to deliver on your expectations. However, your client changing his mind on the approach that should be taken is not about the product meeting the expectations, hence not refundable.

  15. 3 out of 5

    --- dimension: code-quality --- The design is really nice, and you can get away without a designer by using this theme. The code quality, on the other hand, is at best mediocre. There are a lot of one of styles across the entire codebase, components are poorely separated, Typescript doesn't use strict and there needs to be a considerable amount of time invested into using this TS code in another project.

  16. 1 out of 5

    --- dimension: customer-support --- I had a problem, and the team chosed not to solve it.

  17. 5 out of 5

    --- dimension: code-quality --- This one is really good, but could you provide a git version or github repo? It will help us easy to track your changes.

  18. 5 out of 5

    --- dimension: code-quality --- This kit is pretty good! I bought the v5 built with NextJS. For my project, I originally wanted a kit built with CRA. I'd loved the kit sources include CRA structure too, but the code was so clean I migrate some parts (I needed) to my CRA based project without effort!

  19. 5 out of 5

    --- dimension: customer-support --- This is an amazing kit! The new v5 update is amazing. I also needed some help with deploying to firebase and I reached out to customer support. I got amazing and quick help from Alex and got it solved. Will be buying this kit many more times in the future for other projects ?

  20. 5 out of 5

    --- dimension: customer-support --- This code is truly beautiful. It is a pleasure to work with him. Best tech support experience. Good luck creating a great product for us!